On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, RW wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 08:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin wrote:
I don't follow what you're saying, can you provide an example?
They have something like:
Content-Type: text; charset="utf-8"
rather than
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
It's probably a rare mistake, but I was thinking of a rule like:
header __MISSING_SUBTYPE_1 Content-Type =~ /^\w+[;\s]/
mimeheader __MISSING_SUBTYPE_2 Content-Type =~ /^\w+[;\s]/
meta MISSING_SUBTYPE __MISSING_SUBTYPE_1 || __MISSING_SUBTYPE_2
Seems reasonable, but if it *is* a rare mistake there may not be enough in
the masscheck corpus to get it scored and published.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pork (n): (political) The manifestation of the principle that it is
a felony to bribe a legislator, unless you are also a legislator.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: April Fools' day
