Thanks to this header my server automatically filtered your email into my scanned spam folder.
Seems appropriate enough. :) > On Mar 7, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote: > > > > Am 07.03.2016 um 19:01 schrieb Chalmers: >> I see. Hmmm. >> I have the system really screwed down tight, and understand how I can use >> the mail reading client to run a rule to divert such a message to a specific >> mailbox. I thought it may be possible to divert messages that do get marked >> as spam to be dumped. >> I can't see how some get through but they do, and as they are always spam, >> I'm happy to dump them. I have the system set to just reject nearly >> everything suspicious at the gate, but 1 or 2 still sneak through, so I'm >> just trying to not even see them in the mailboxes at all. >> I could put my configs up, but it's just clutter at this stage. > > as i already posted spamass-milter has a reject-score different from the > tag-score to be sure what got rejected > > if you don't care just write a sieve rule on the mailserver or use a proper > mailcient like Tunderbird which supports useable filters > >>> On 7 Mar 2016, at 5:44 pm, RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 07:35:37 +0000 >>> rob...@chalmers.com.au wrote: >>> >>>> I'm trying to drop such messages, not have them still appear in my >>>> mailbox, but can't find a way? Any ideas? >>> >>> Are you sure you really want to do this? IMO it's a really bad idea. >>> >>> Rejecting or discarding very high-scoring spam is one-thing, but it's >>> sensible to file the lower-scoring spam into a folder somewhere. >>> >>> How to do any of this has nothing to do with SpamAssassin, so you need >>> say what you are currently doing with you mail >
