Re: Another way to use my filter in SA

[Reindl Harald]

Am 20.01.2016 um 22:59 schrieb Marc Perkel:

Here's another way to use my evolution filtering idea with SA.

Get rid of all the rule scores and just make a list of the rule names

no, the whole point of rule scores and bayes or whatever analysis is just another rule score is balance / auto-correction to avoid wrong results just because of single mistakes (mistrain, bad composed mail) besides that URIBL and DNSBL/DNSWL and SPF and what not is another point of balance

 From the rule names generate all combinations of those rule names up to
4 rule names in a fingerprint and learn those fingerprints as either ham
or spam. sort of like this:

“A” “AB” “B” “C” “AC” “ABC” “BC” “D” “AD” “ABD” “BD” “CD” “ACD” “ABCD”
“BCD” “E” “AE” “BE” “CE” “ACE” “BCE” “DE” “ADE” “ABDE” “BDE” “CDE”
“ACDE” “ABCDE” “BCDE”

Then - when a new message comes in you make the same combo of
fingerprints from the rule names and then use my formula.

as the only decision?
for sure not

card(Test intersect Spam diff Ham) - card(Test Intersect Ham diff Spam)

Positive result = spam
Negative result = ham

nothing but the summary of tests (except explicit whitelists or blacklists) has to be allowed for a final decision

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature