On 2015-12-29 19:44 -0500, Bill Cole wrote: > On 29 Dec 2015, at 18:54, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > > >In fact sa-learn accepts multiple named arguments on the command line, > >so the alternative I use is to go through the spambox N files at a time > >in a shell loop. (I have N=100 but obviously this depends.) > > Which successfully ignores the original issue of this thread completely: that > the > user sa-learn must run as cannot read the files being learnt. If you pass > unreadable > filenames as arguments, sa-learn just whines and fails. Shockingly, that is > not the > desired result.
Clearly you can do the su magic if needed. The point is that the overhead which you fear is reduced N times. -- Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages. Rule 420: All persons more than eight miles high to leave the court.
