On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:39 PM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
> On 12/29/2015 4:29 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On Dec 29, 2015, at 2:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote: >> >>> On 12/29/2015 3:46 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>>> On Dec 29, 2015, at 1:42 PM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/29/2015 3:38 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >>>>>> Is there a reason that headers are left with leading spaces? >>>>>> >>>>>> I’ve noticed that I have to write rules as: >>>>>> >>>>>> Subject =~ /^ Great [Jj]ob [Oo]pportunity/ >>>>>> >>>>>> because of the leading space… >>>>> I'm at a complete loss. I add plenty of Subject rules with no leading >>>>> space. Never seen this issue. >>>> I had some rules which weren’t firing so I had to change to /^ .../ or >>>> else /^ ?.../ to make them match. >>>> >>>> Not sure why. >>>> >>>> This is with SA 3.4.1 on Fedora 21. >>>> >>>> -Philip >>> What's the original Subject header look like from the original mail? >>> >>> Regards, >>> KAM >> >> This was a while ago. I’d have to go back and look. Maybe this one? >> >> Subject: [IDN][#2056301] CareerBuilder: Open position for you > OK, I was thinking perhaps an alternate charset or something but never run > into this issue. > > If you are anchoring your Subject searches, allowing for whitespace, etc. is > a decent idea though from Reindl. > > regards, > KAM I did recall that I used the patch here: https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6360#c4 to be able to debug my rules, using a rule that would match any non-empty subject: value to dump out what it was (the “====> got hit: “…”” line), and it was always showing a leading space… -Philip
