On 12/11/2015 07:24 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 11.12.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Axb:
On 12/11/2015 06:51 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, how many of you trained chistmas spam this year while my bayes did
know it from last year?
I like my Bayes fresh like bread out of the oven, new guitar strings and
clean sheets.
well, i like my bayes catch spam at every point in time without repeat
to slip things through once already caught - tell me one reason why i
should let phishing pass through to customers which was already detected
In my playpen, phishing is detected by Digests, autogenerated rules, URI
strings & domain BLs, etc. Don't need to babysit Bayes for that.
96% of all milter-rejected mails got 3.5-7.5 points from bayes while at
the same time 77% of all scanned mail got -3.5 points - in other words
most ham has BAYES_00 most spam hast BAYES_80-BAYES_999 - that's what
the bayes is supposed to do
Thats' what YOU want it to do. Your kitchen, your sauce.
For me, Bayes is just another spice in the rack. And my rack has lots of
jars.
My trap flow keeps it all well fed and happy.
Without knowing it, even you are using some of my data. I just see it 20
sec before you can make use of it.
