Re: Try my IXHASH

[Bill Cole]

On 10 Dec 2015, at 13:25, Paul Stead wrote:

On 10/12/15 18:23, Paul Stead wrote:
On 10/12/15 17:24, Bill Cole wrote:
On 10 Dec 2015, at 10:48, Paul Stead wrote:
0.004% hit rate on ham

Clarify this please: 4 out of 100k hits are ham (not so bad) OR 4 
out
of 100k hams get hit (OUCH)

The former, 4 out of 100k hit are ham emails
Re-clarifying - out of 100k ham emails, 4 of these hit on this iXhash

So: unfit for a high score (e.g. the suggested 5) on a system receiving 
a lot of ham. Good to know.