Am 03.12.2015 um 10:47 schrieb Sebastian Arcus:
On 03/12/15 01:40, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 03.12.2015 um 01:14 schrieb Alex:On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote:On 2015-12-02 09:14, Sebastian Arcus wrote:Perfect - that's exactly the sort of real-life based advice I was looking for. Many thanks!I run a small shared hosting environment, with a global bayes for all users as not enough users are ready/willing/able to take the time to sort ham (although more will press "this is spam") and in general, the results work out well enough.A portion of the bayes database is the header information from the email. What does it mean for those headers that contain info specific to a particular domain or site when it's transferred to another domain or site where those specifics will be different?see attached php/formail-script and list of ignored/stripped headers we strip a large portion of headers including especially the Received headers with "formail" and preprend a egenric one on top from all samples before train themDoes that mean that transferring bayes databases between sites without stripping the headers wouldn't work - or it is just more effective if one strips the headers?
it worked without strip them around 6 months but it works better nowsee the 77.72% BAYES_00 which would be more but some trained ham is in shortcircuit and so don't touch bayes at all
"SPAMMY" means >= BAYES_60 in the stats BAYES_00 3914 77.72 % BAYES_05 87 1.72 % BAYES_20 134 2.66 % BAYES_40 108 2.14 % BAYES_50 288 5.71 % BAYES_60 61 1.21 % BAYES_80 45 0.89 % BAYES_95 34 0.67 % BAYES_99 365 7.24 % BAYES_999 319 6.33 % DELIVERED 6609 95.18 % DNSWL 6249 90.00 % SPF 4586 66.05 % SPF/DKIM WL 1880 27.07 % SHORTCIRCUIT 1900 27.36 % BLOCKED 515 7.41 % SPAMMY 505 7.27 % 98.05 % (OF TOTAL BLOCKED)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
