Hi,

>>>>> *  2.3 EMPTY_MESSAGE Message appears to have no textual parts and no
>>>>> *      Subject: text
>>>>> *  1.0 FSL_EMPTY_BODY Message has completely empty body
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Those two should probably be evaluated for overlap.
>>>>
>>> Or at best rescoring those for your personal installation.
>>
>> Do we agree there is a potential overlap? Should I open a bug for
>> this, or just continue to adjust locally?
>
> Possibly a silly question, but where is FSL_EMPTY_BODY coming from? The
> string has no occurrences in the current trunk.

My apologies; I forgot those are rules created by Steve Freegard and
posted to the list some time ago.

Thanks,
Alex

Reply via email to