Hi KAM,
why not - spamassassin seems to respect the user_prefs file. Of course
I'd like to stick ti spamc, but if there is no solution for the
user_prefs - issue, it fits only half of my needs.
Best regard,
Marc
Am 11.09.2015 um 11:47 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:
Spamc exists to save startup compilation time.
If you have real users and use procmail then spamc will be much faster and pass
along the username.
If you use a glue or have virtual users, you might need logic to call spamc or
spamassassin with a desired username. But for me, I would anticipate switching
will just make things slower and not solve the issue.
Regards,
KAM
On September 11, 2015 5:35:12 AM AST, Marc Richter <m...@marc-richter.info>
wrote:
Guess this means that I have to run "spamassassin" instead of spamc,
don't I?
I do not understand the reason for spamc to exist then
