On 7/9/2015 6:07 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 07:58:39 +1000
Noel Butler <noel.but...@ausics.net> wrote:
+1
I'll throw my +1 in on this also. Almost by definition, the kinds of
organizations who buy into these certifications to get their mail
delivered are unlikely to be the kinds of organizations I want to
hear from.
Just as SPF "pass" is a mild spam indicator nowadays, so is a "pass"
on these kinds of certifications.
Regards,
Dianne.
I think your information on SPF is a bit out of date (though indeed when
the spec was new, you could easily score it quite heavily).
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20150709-r1690028-n&rule=SPF_PASS&srcpath=&g=Change
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20150709-r1690028-n&rule=SPF_HELO_PASS&srcpath=&g=Change
It's not good enough to give a negative score all by itself, since it's
still very easy to make useless SPF records, but it's not what it used
to be.
