Am 10.06.2015 um 11:27 schrieb Ben:
Does SA have pre-existing tests that look for this sort of thing (so I can just boost the score a little bit), or does anyone have any ideas how I might counter such spam ?Look at this fine specimen as an example : http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=XjV94PMW
Content analysis details: (23.8 points, 5.5 required) pts rule name description---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.0 CUST_DNSBL_21 RBL: dnsbl-uce.thelounge.net (dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net) [91.193.129.190 listed in dnsbl-uce.thelounge.net]
7.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 0.9995]
-0.1 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 RBL: Average reputation (+2)
[91.193.129.190 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
4.5 CUST_DNSBL_8 RBL: dnsbl.inps.de
[91.193.129.190 listed in dnsbl.inps.de]
4.5 CUST_DNSBL_7 RBL: b.barracudacentral.org
[91.193.129.190 listed in
b.barracudacentral.org]
0.4 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 0.9995]
0.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
2.5 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host
with no rDNS
2.5 TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML To: misformatted and no rDNS and HTML only 0.5 XPRIO Has X-Priority header
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
