And while I do monitor users@ for issues, a lack of updates
does not present a user issue. It is my opinion that if an admin is
concerned about rules updates, they should be monitoring dev@ and/or
ruleqa@.
Plus, let's have a look at the definitions of aforementioned lists :
Dev
Unless you are working on a patch to SpamAssassin, this is probably not
a list you need to use. If you're not already on the general users list,
you should probably go there first
RuleQA
The RuleQA list is for people involved in the project's automated rule
generation and related technologies including masscheck.
So... I'm not "working on a patch" and I'm not "involved in automated
rule generation", therefore as far as I'm concerned the need for me to
suscribe to either is not there.
Perhaps its time for a low-volume announce type list? You don't seem to
have one of those unless I missed it in my quick scan over your lists page ?
