Re: FPs on RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP

[Reindl Harald]

Am 20.04.2015 um 20:51 schrieb Axb:

On 04/20/2015 08:45 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:

Am 20.04.2015 um 20:42 schrieb Kevin A. McGrail:

On 4/20/2015 2:23 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:20:35 -0400
"Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:

Are you seeing it on a lot of emails?

Over 25000 today; every single one of them from an "...outlook.com"
server. :(

Regards,

Dianne.

Weird.  Any chance you know one of the senders and can ask them to email
kmcgr...@pccc.com and raptorrevie...@pccc.com with a test? then you and
I can compare tests hit, etc.

seems to not hit every mail from outlook.com but when it hits at all
most are FP's with BAYES_00 and just *one* spam message here the whole
month with a score of 14 and so catched by enough other rules

looks like RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP does much more harm than good

the rule is good - send your complaint to Microsoft.
0/8 is not assigned

the rule is good in a perfect world
mailservers have to interact with the real world

no a rule with 1.3 points hitting to 99.999% ham messages is not good and it does not matter who is responsible - sening a complaint to microsoft does not solve a *real problem now*

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature