On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Paul Stead wrote:
On 03/04/15 07:26, Niamh Holding wrote:
> Apparently not as there is no hit for these headers-
>
> To:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
> Subject: (ni...@fullbore.co.uk) Get Life Cover from just 17p per day
This seems to be because of the trailing parentheses after the email
address in the subject. The regex checks for [>,\s\n] after the address
match.
I'm not sure of the original intention of this part of the regex so hard
to say what to fix - to match this specific case you can add ) to the
list of chars.
Noted.
I'll work on some refinements this weekend.
OK, tuned so it's less-specific about punctuation around the email address
in the Subject, and it attempts to parse an email address out of the
Subject if it appears prior to the To.
As AXB's masscheck host died leading to spam starvation in masschecks, I
don't know how soon the new version will be in updates.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You know things are bad when Pravda says we [the USA] have gone
too far to the left. -- Joe Huffman
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
9 days until Thomas Jefferson's 272nd Birthday
