On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 12:13:30 -0600 Amir Caspi wrote: > On Feb 16, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@pccc.com> > wrote: > > > I'm happy to look at a recent sample and throw it through my system > > to see what it hits but overall, I've been seeing the exact > > opposite. > > So, one of my users has been getting dozens (sometimes nearly 100) > FNs per DAY over the last few weeks. Even though many of these > emails are hitting BAYES_999, they are not hitting any other > non-negligible scoring rules. I have set BAYES_99 + BAYES_999 to a > combined score of 4.9 because I don't want it to be a complete poison > pill,
Personally I've found that trying to work around BAYES_99 not being a poison pill causes more FPs making it one YMMV.
