Am 26.03.2015 um 14:04 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:54:45 +0100
Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:

1) Directed to multiple recipients...

the content is the same, reject it or not

That is a non-solution.  You are assuming all users have the same
criteria for what is or isn't spammy content.

you stopped premature reading my repsonse - WHY?
look again at the "X-Spam-Status" header below
a single mail sent from gmail to 2 addresses i own

X-Local-Envelope-From: <reindl.har...@gmail.com>
X-Local-Envelope-To: <h.rei...@thelounge.net>
Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com
Message-ID:
<caacbkvp4dpczlhodtuvugcfq9pat10yozsaum_7k9ositbo...@mail.gmail.com>

X-Local-Envelope-From: <reindl.har...@gmail.com>
X-Local-Envelope-To: <ha...@rhsoft.net>
Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com
Message-ID:
<caacbkvp4dpczlhodtuvugcfq9pat10yozsaum_7k9ositbo...@mail.gmail.com>

and in fact both messages got a different score because my coampany address is in "MOST_SPAM" and my private one in "MANY_SPAM"

X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1, tag-level=5.5, block-level=8.0
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1, tag-level=5.5, block-level=8.0

the same way you reject a mail with a invalid recipient and two valid
ones

Very clever... except you cannot do any content scanning until you've
already accepted all of the RCPT: commands.

and how does that matter?

there is a reason that typical bounce messages contains "to one or more recipients" - and the bounce of the delivering server just contains the response of the destination - nothing new

Care to try solving again?  You solve the problem of different
content-scanning rules for different recipients, with no possibility
of backscatter, no silent discards, and no delays due to tempfailing,
and you'll make a fortune

it is solved, you just don't get it


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to