Am 26.03.2015 um 14:04 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:54:45 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:1) Directed to multiple recipients...the content is the same, reject it or notThat is a non-solution. You are assuming all users have the same criteria for what is or isn't spammy content.
you stopped premature reading my repsonse - WHY? look again at the "X-Spam-Status" header below a single mail sent from gmail to 2 addresses i own X-Local-Envelope-From: <reindl.har...@gmail.com> X-Local-Envelope-To: <h.rei...@thelounge.net> Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com Message-ID: <caacbkvp4dpczlhodtuvugcfq9pat10yozsaum_7k9ositbo...@mail.gmail.com> X-Local-Envelope-From: <reindl.har...@gmail.com> X-Local-Envelope-To: <ha...@rhsoft.net> Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com Message-ID: <caacbkvp4dpczlhodtuvugcfq9pat10yozsaum_7k9ositbo...@mail.gmail.com>and in fact both messages got a different score because my coampany address is in "MOST_SPAM" and my private one in "MANY_SPAM"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1, tag-level=5.5, block-level=8.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.1, tag-level=5.5, block-level=8.0
the same way you reject a mail with a invalid recipient and two valid onesVery clever... except you cannot do any content scanning until you've already accepted all of the RCPT: commands.
and how does that matter?there is a reason that typical bounce messages contains "to one or more recipients" - and the bounce of the delivering server just contains the response of the destination - nothing new
Care to try solving again? You solve the problem of different content-scanning rules for different recipients, with no possibility of backscatter, no silent discards, and no delays due to tempfailing, and you'll make a fortune
it is solved, you just don't get it
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature