On 3/14/2015 1:31 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
hm - that's all additional layers leading to more complexity
couldn't SA at the end internally cut the message after configuration
value XX size for scanning while add the headers to the unaltered
version?
Sure but I have lots of feature requests and not so many coders. Plus I
have a solution that works for me and lots of other stuff that takes my
priority. Perhaps someone will be inspired by the idea to bang out a
patch because it does work well for us in real-world testing.
Regards,
KAM
