On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 06:18 -0600, Dave Pooser wrote: > Wouldn't that have to be a rawbody rule? > Thanks, Dave. I thought I was probably missing something obvious and that was it.
Martin
On Fri, 2015-01-02 at 06:18 -0600, Dave Pooser wrote: > Wouldn't that have to be a rawbody rule? > Thanks, Dave. I thought I was probably missing something obvious and that was it.
Martin