That didn't pan out, the svn version has serious bugs, so stuck with old 1.0.3 , shouldnt be so bad since I rarely post in here anyway :)
On 06/12/2014 14:07, Noel Butler wrote: > No problems Jo, I might give its svn version a go, but as its the weekend I'm > about to jet off for a couple days, will try it monday, and 12pt as large? > LOL, maybe thats why RC defaults to 10pt as average :) > > Cheers > > On 06/12/2014 13:21, jdow wrote: > >> Hm, it renders much more readable. I normally default reading to about 12 to >> 14 point fonts. The 10 point was getting down to a size that some letters >> were becoming ambiguous, which seriously slows down reading. >> >> Thanks for trying. >> >> As a side note I see that the plain text of mine you quoted is rendered as >> about 14. That's a not unusual mutation for MUAs it seems. There is no font >> size declaration so it may be a result of some of the things I did to T'bird >> trying to see if I could tame stuff. The humor this look revealed is that >> yuor messages is "font-size: x-large;". And about 12pt is what T'bird >> classifies as x-large it appears. Most humorous. >> >> I hope you have a good one.
