On 30/11/2014 21:23, Martin wrote:
> -----Original Message----- From: Martin Gregorie [mailto:mar...@gregorie.org] > Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:08 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Argument "perl_version" isn't numeric On Sat, 2014-11-29 at > 20:39 -0800, John Hardin wrote: But this effectively means we cannot add new > features to SA conditionals because they might do this to older installs. Can > SA set a $too_old flag to say that that the Perl version number check failed? > If so, it seems the me that, at runtime, it would be reasonable to exclude > new version-dependent features if either the $too_old flag is set or the > version number is lower than the feature needs. It would also be reasonable > for sa_update to report the exclusion since that serves to remind the > sysadmin to upgrade. Martin Personally I don't want any warning messages unless something has failed. Yesterday and again this morning I was getting warning emails every 5 minutes from cron jobs, which is really annoying. Will the file available via sa-update be the commented out one from tonight? Or do I need to turn sa-update off for a while? Martin huh? who doesnt null out cron these days and allow for in-individual-cron-file error reporting... but I hear ya, this current situation is unacceptable and should be rolled back without delay.
