On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 00:14 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote: > 2014-10-20 20:11, Reindl Harald wrote: > > [...] > > > > sorry, no, but what i face repeatly are messages like below > > in fact only if the machine has more than 1 dns in resolv.conf > > configure it to just use 127.0.0.1 and that won't happen > > > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: no callback for id > > 40563/IN/A/uwc.org.dbl.spamhaus.org, ignored; packet: ;; Answer > > received from 10.0.0.6 (53 bytes) > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; HEADER SECTION > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; id = 40563 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; qr = 1 aa = 0 tc = > > 0 rd = 1 opcode = QUERY > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; ra = 1 z = 0 ad = > > 0 cd = 0 rcode = SERVFAIL > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; qdcount = 1 > > ancount = 0 nscount = 0 arcount = 1 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; do = 0 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; EDNS version 0 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; flags: 0000 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; rcode: NOERROR > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; size: 1024 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; option: > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; QUESTION SECTION (1 > > record) > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; > > uwc.org.dbl.spamhaus.org. IN A > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; ANSWER SECTION (0 > > records) > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; AUTHORITY SECTION > > (0 records) > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION > > (1 record) > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; EDNS version 0 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; flags: 0000 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; rcode: NOERROR > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; size: 1024 > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: [...] ;; option: > > Oct 19 09:04:42 caladan spamd[20546]: dns: no likely matching queries > > for id 40563 > > This happens when a DNS response comes late and ALARM signal > interrupts its decoding. They call it a 'design feature', > I call it bug: > > https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=83451 > > Mark
This seems possibly somehow related to an update to the kernel. This morning there was an update to kernel 3.13.0-39-generic and right after the required restart I started seeing: localhost spamd[2195]: dns: sendto() to [127.0.0.1]:53 failed: Connection refused, no more alternatives localhost spamd[2195]: dns: bad dns reply: Connection refused My /etc/resolvconf shows: nameserver 127.0.1.1 search PK5001Z I don't seem to be getting any replies on the Ubuntu list, maybe it's because it seems related to spamd, I don't know. I do know that scan times are ridiculous scantime=201.2 Any more ideas or should I just 'wait and see' if it suddenly corrects itself as before? Chris -- Chris KeyID 0xE372A7DA98E6705C 31.11°N 97.89°W (Elev. 1092 ft) 17:02:28 up 9:14, 2 users, load average: 0.22, 0.14, 0.14 Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS, kernel 3.13.0-39-generic
