On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, jdebert wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
That's an SA directive. It says "if the message scores spammy,
prepend '[SPAM][JUNGLEVISION SPAM CHECK]' to the Subject header."
Ah. Missing some messages here.
It does appear that sa is the culprit but why it's doing it is not
evident. There's still not enough data. Perhaps turning up debugging
would be helpful?
The apparent culprit is a procmail rule that explicitly passes a message
through the mail system again. The message is being scanned twice. If she
can either deliver to a local mailbox rather than forwarding to an email
address, or modify the procmail rule that calls SA to ignore messages that
have already passed through the server once, I think the problem would go
away.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...the Fates notice those who buy chainsaws...
-- www.darwinawards.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
4 days until Halloween
