> On October 4, 2014 6:50:44 PM jdebert <jdeb...@garlic.com> wrote:
> > > X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 mailsea.docusign.net JQ9N42F3MTC8 > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > Never seen this before from sendmail. Bogus DKIM header? > > Iis it also possible to test for conflicting X- headers? > Possible extend dkim plugin to bayes ignore header if not dkim signed, > tricky yes, but imho makes sense Why wouldn't all DKIM headers (X-DKIM above and real ones) be excluded? These DKIM headers by themselves are not a good indicator as they can be forged just like any header that is not generated by the local MTA or a trusted relay. Let the DKIM_VALID_AU rule do it's job.
