Am 03.10.2014 um 19:34 schrieb LuKreme: > [SPAM] is not a spam marker I’ve ever seen so it seems perfectly OK to me > You are assuming, I think wrongly, that the [SPAM] tag is being used because > of a content filter and not simply a tag to identify the name of the list
it is the *default* tag for a lot of commercial spamfilters if a message was detected as spam but not high enough to drop there is a reason why i had that sieve-filter and i saw that tagging over many years from a lot of other users not only the one with Barracuda Networks products
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
