On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Deeztek Support wrote:
I went ahead and set BAYES_00 to -1.9 and I just received a spam message
with these headers:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.204 tagged_above=-999 required=0.6
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DCC_CHECK=1.1, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS=0.738,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.735, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URI_OPTOUT_3LD=1]
autolearn=disabled
From looking at it, it looks like the BAYES_00 took away -1.9 which
made the difference of whether or not it got tagged as spam or not. I
don't think -1.9 is the correct setting here. Any thoughts?
thoughts? you changed a score and SA did what you told it to.
What are you trying to achieve (other than using the SA list as your
changes log)
as already suggested by John Hardin, fix URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001
"Also: URIBL_BLOCKED - you really want to set up a local recursive
(non-forwarding) DNS server for SA so that your URIBL lookups will work,
that might help a lot. "
