On Thu, 2014-09-04 at 13:04 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > On 03.09.14 15:13, Jesse Norell wrote: > > Both today and in the past I've looked at some FP's that scored very > >high on AWL. At least today I dug up the old messages that caused AWL > >to get out of line, and trained them as ham. AWL's scores still show > >the high scores on those (in this case I manually corrected AWL). It > >sure seems like manual training should at minimum remove the incorrect > >score from AWL, if not actually make an adjustment in the opposite > >direction. > > spamassassin has options for manipulating adress list: > --add-to-whitelist --add-to-blacklist --remove-from-whitelist > --add-addr-to-whitelist --add-addr-to-blacklist --remove-addr-from-whitelist > > and you can clean up AWL by using sa-awl.
I can as an admin, but pop/imap users can't. They can access the spam/ham training, it just doesn't correct the AWL data any. In this case I'm looking at, a few messages came in first that got AWL way off, and now training it as ham (which is hard enough to get users to do) doesn't help the situation. (Some of our systems allow the user access to whitelist, but unfortunately this one doesn't - they can't "fix it".) > > Ie. after training, AWL had score of ~47 from 7 messages. Seems like > >those FP scores should be subtracted, and even another -5 per message > >trained wouldn't hurt. Likewise, FN should adjust AWL upwards on manual > >training, no? > > I am not sure how should the manual training be done when talking about AWL. > The only way I think is to remove the address from AWL. Just adjust the score would be another option. "AWL, you got it wrong, lets take the score the other direction." (or at least undue the mistake/damage it just did) You could have a config option for how much adjustment to make in the other direction (maybe 3 to 5ish?). -- Jesse Norell Kentec Communications, Inc. 970-522-8107 - www.kci.net
