Thank You for the
answer Karsten,
you have right, Phil doesn't exists, (as example.com) but i hide the real address for obvious reasons, and it is a "role" email that i want will receive only mail with subject "CV" or "Curriculum" and all the general mail will be treated and scored as spam. My intention are not "top secret", i will be glad even only if you address me to the "SA conf docs" or "the rule-writing wiki". Best RegardsIl 03/09/2014 05:21, Karsten Bräckelmann ha scritto: On Mon, 2014-09-01 at 07:36 +0200, Luciano Rinetti wrote:I need a rule that, when a message is sento to p...@example.com and the Subject contains "CV" or "Curriculum", scores the message with -9Scoring the message with $number is impossible and not how SA works. Triggering a rule with a negative score (e.x. -9) is possible.and a rule that, when a message is sent to to p...@example.com and the Subject doesn't contains CV or Curriculum, scores the message with 7Same. Won't "score the message with 7", but can trigger a rule worth some points. The specified criteria are trivial, and can be easily translated into rules. Reading the SA conf docs and maybe some of the rule-writing wiki docs should enable the reader to do exactly that. (Hint: meta rules) However, since this request is just too simple, and way too easy too shoot one's own foot, I'll spend more time on this explanation than simply dumping the requested flawed rules would take. What are you actually after? What is your problem? And why would Phil distinguish that strong between Subject tagged mail and general mail to him? Sure, because it's not phil but a role account. But you chose to disguise the purpose, so it's harder for us to help you. It's easier, if you don't try to hide your actual question. |
- A rule for Phil Luciano Rinetti
- Re: A rule for Phil Karsten Bräckelmann
- Re: A rule for Phil Luciano Rinetti
- Re: A rule for Phil Karsten Bräckelmann
- Re: A rule for Phil Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: A rule for Phil Karsten Bräckelmann
- Re: A rule for Phil Philip Prindeville
- Re: A rule for Phil Karsten Bräckelmann
- Re: A rule for Phil Bowie Bailey