please keep list mail on the list.
Those reports are "added" by Exim's interface which does not seem to
respect the local.cf directives.
Maybe some Exim user can help you further, either on the SA or if not on
the Exim list.
Sorry, can't help further...
On 08/29/2014 11:29 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
unfortunatelly not, X-Spam-Reports are still there
I added these lines on the senders side (hostname hausmeister) ..
receiver is aohsupport01
<snip>
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
"hausmeister.intern.luisesteiner.at",
has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
postmaster for details.
Content preview: Forwarded message Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:32:23
+0200 (CEST)
From: Wolfgang Fürtbauer <wolfg...@luisesteiner.at> To: wolfgang
Fuertbauer
<wolfg...@luisesteiner.at> Subject: tewst (fwd) [...]
Content analysis details: (-221.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
-100 SHORTCIRCUIT Not all rules were run, due to a
shortcircuited rule
-20 SC_HAM No description available.
...
X-Spam-Report: Software zur Erkennung von "Spam" auf dem Rechner
aohsupport02.asamer.holding.ah
hat die eingegangene E-mail als m▒gliche "Spam"-Nachricht identifiziert.
Die urspr▒ngliche Nachricht wurde an diesen Bericht angeh▒ngt, so dass
Sie sie anschauen k▒nnen (falls es doch eine legitime E-Mail ist) oder
▒hnliche unerw▒nschte Nachrichten in Zukunft markieren k▒nnen.
Bei Fragen zu diesem Vorgang wenden Sie sich bitte an
postmaster
Vorschau: Forwarded message Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:32:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wolfgang Fürtbauer <wolfg...@luisesteiner.at> To: wolfgang
Fuertbauer
<wolfg...@luisesteiner.at> Subject: tewst (fwd) [...]
Inhaltsanalyse im Detail: (-1.1 Punkte, 5.0 ben▒tigt)
Pkte Regelname Beschreibung
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: Senderechner entspricht SPF-Datensatz
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach
Bayes-Test: 0-1%
[score: 0.0000]
0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host
with no rDNS
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware
tools.
Am 29.08.2014 11:08, schrieb Axb:
On 08/29/2014 11:00 AM, Fürtbauer Wolfgang wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to remove "my own" X-Spam-Report for ham mails leaving my
organisation in order not to bother the other party.
I had serveral mails returned because of the X-Spam-Reports
<snip>
Improper folded header field made up entirely of whitespace (char 20
hex):
X-Spam-Report: ... postmaster for details.\n \n Content previ[...]
<snap>
my only add_header line is:
add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
tests=_TESTS_ shortcircuit=_SCTYPE_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_
version=_VERSION_"
glue is spamd called from exim
remove your "remove_header ham Report "
try this in local.cf
report_safe 0
clear_headers
add_header spam Flag _YESNOCAPS_
# This should be in one line
add_header spam Status _YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
tests=_TESTS_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_ version=_VERSION_
add_header spam Level _STARS(*)_
add_header spam Report _REPORT_
this "should" prevent adding those SA headers to msgs below threshold
