On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 19:50:20 +0000,
David Jones <djo...@ena.com> wrote:

Ian> I definitely have FNs today (about 10 by now today, normally 0).

Ian> Looks like some/all RBLs tests are not working.  I have not changed
Ian> my configuration at all.

Ian> Sample here:

Ian> http://pastebin.com/dsqaVA9Z

David> This hit DCC_CHECK, BAYES_50, CRM114, BOGOFILTER and KAM_EU rules
David> and would have been blocked on my SA 3.4.0 servers.

Isn't it a bit odd that SA has rules for all these other Bayes powered
backends?  Why not give a bit more weight to its own Bayes instead,
rather than make users forage for other tools that do essentially the
same thing?

David> (I understand that the DCC_CHECK hit could have also hit on your
David> mail server too after time had passed if you have DCC enabled.)

Don't you need non-free software for DCC?

(Meanwhile, more spam came in.  This is definitely a crisis for me.)

-- 
Please *no* private copies of mailing list or newsgroup messages.
Local Variables:
mode:claws-external
End:

Reply via email to