On 08/15/2014 05:21 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 8/15/2014 11:07 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 15 Aug 2014 10:02:14 -0500
Steve Bergman <sbergma...@gmail.com> wrote:
So basically, elevate it to the level of an absolute blacklist.
I'm not sure I trust Zen that much. I'm more a Bayes proponent than a
DNSBL proponent.
Me too. I'm also surprised that the OP claimed it caught 70% of his
spam. I see a much lower hit-rate on Zen; it hits on about 25% of our
spam.
I'm not the OP of the thread, but I am the one who brought up Zen.
Here are the stats from my server for the last month:
53% Spamhaus rejections
26% Marked as spam by SA
21% Delivered as ham
Considering only the spam:
67% Spamhaus rejections
33% Marked by SA
YMMV, but it works quite well for me.
Zen is the only DNSBL I trust enough to use as an actual blacklist.
agreed, and with Postfix I like:
reject_rhsbl_reverse_client dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.2,
reject_rhsbl_client dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.2,
reject_rhsbl_helo dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.2
