On Thu, 2014-07-24 at 21:43 +0000, Greg Ledford wrote:
> So it looks like SA and Amavis are being totally bypassed?
Yes, there should be a few X-Spam-* headers added by SA or Amavis above
the pasted ones. And of course there should be a Received header by
postfix.
Since you didn't mentioned it in your reply, let me stress again that's
where you need to look into first -- if I understood your intended
set-up of Postfix with Amavis/SA *before* the MS server. Direct delivery
to the Microsoft SMTP (as it was till now) instead of Postfix might be
as easy as a bad or stale MX record...
FWIW, instead of only looking out for the relevant headers, both Postfix
and Amavis/SA have log files. Might be worth having a look at or tail -f
'ing.
Also, all this including X-Spam-* headers applies to ham, too. So you
can send yourself test mail, to observe it eventually flowing through
your Postfix environment.
> Great. Looks like I'll be spending another night in front of this box.
> Thanks for the input.
NP. Oh, and please always keep threads on-list, until you really mean to
reply in private only.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
