On Jul 3, 2014, at 2:43 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann <guent...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 15:32 -0400, Lee Dilkie wrote: >> cute.. >> >> his is the mail system at host relay.mailchannels.net. >> >> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not >> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. > >> Remote-MTA: dns; mx1.us.apache.org >> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 SPF forgery: Please see >> >> >> can't unsubscribe from an anti-spam list because my request looks like spam.. >> :) > > For the same reason your reply isn't accepted by the list server. > > > Pro-tip: Include the relay as permitted sender to your SPF record, if > you opt-in to publish an SPF record and want to use a relay... > > dbg: spf: checking EnvelopeFrom (helo=relay.mailchannels.net, > ip=184.154.112.233, envfrom=l...@dilkie.com) > > dbg: spf: query for l...@dilkie.com/184.154.112.233/relay.mailchannels.net: > result: fail, comment: Please see > http://www.openspf.net/Why?s=mfrom;id=lee%40dilkie.com;ip=184.154.112.233;r=lenny, > text: Mechanism '-all’ > matched > Which reminds me: is there a ‘reflector’ address anyone can mail to which will verify their SPF and DKIM records? Or… no, I guess such a beast would be susceptible to reflector attacks from spoofed addresses… so it’s a dumb question. Unless it cached a response and you had to click on a link to see the results instead… -Philip
