I got the following MIME body part below, and I’m wondering if it would make 
sense to filter on this as well.

Given that it’s text/plain with an implicit charset=“us-ascii” and an implicit 
content-transfer-encoding of 7bit, the sequence &#x[0-9A-F]{4} doesn’t really 
parse into a 16-bit character, would it? That would be a broken MUA that made 
such a leap...

Wouldn’t that normally render as the character ‘&’, ‘#’, ‘x’, etc. rather than 
the unicode16 or UTF-8 character with that hex value?

There might be times when someone has sent an attachment improperly encoded 
this way which might have embedded binary values in it, but that’s kind of 
buggy anyway… it should have been done as base64 and application/octet-stream 
in the worst of cases if it has arbitrary binary data.

I wouldn’t want a message where someone gives a couple of examples of encoding 
&#x0400 for instance being flagged as SPAM, but if the text is 20% or more of 
these sequences then I would say that’s SPAM-sign.

Anyway, here’s the body I saw:

--1388-8200-b67c-e579-9c27-df36-12fa-a2eb
Content-Type: text/plain;

Thе Rеаl RеаѕоnThе 
Ꮯоmіng 
Ꮯоllарѕе...Thе 
rеаl rеаѕоn ᎳHY 
HоmеlаndSеcurіtу 
rеcеntlу рurchаѕеd1.7 
Bіllіоn Rоundѕ оf 
аmmunіtіоn...Ꮃhаt Yоu 
Muѕt Dо Tо Ꭼnѕurе 
YоurSаfеtуHоmеlаnd 
ѕеcurіtу іѕ thеrе 
tо ѕеcurеthе hоmеlаnd 
оnlу... Sо thеѕе 
Ьullеtѕаrе rеаlу 
mеаnt fоr thеThіѕ іѕ 
аn 
еmаіlаdvеrtіѕеmеnt
 thаt wаѕ ѕеnt tо уоu 
Ьу Ρаtrіоt Survіvаl 
Ρlаn. If уоuwіѕh tо 
nоlоngеr rеcеіvе 
mеѕѕаgеѕ thаt 
рrоmоtе ѕurvіvаl 
tірѕ, 
рlеаѕеclіck hеrе 
tо unѕuЬѕcrіЬе.4 Unstable as 
water, thou shalt not excel because thou wentest up to thy fathers bed then 
defiledst thou it he went up to my couch.34 And Pharaohnechoh made Eliakim the 
son of Josiah king in the room of Josiah his father, and turned his name to 
Jehoiakim, and took Jehoahaz away and he came to Egypt, and died there.37  And 
the thing was good in the eyes of Pharaoh, and in the eyes o!
f all his servants.

--1388-8200-b67c-e579-9c27-df36-12fa-a2eb

Reply via email to