On 07/02/2014 07:37 AM, Steve Bergman wrote:
Lets turn this around? Can you prove autolearn was ever done to memory?
I'm not really interested in proving anything. I'm interested in being
convinced that autolearn is individual file-based when spamc is run as
the individual user.
It's in the code... but yes, autolearn is always file based and respects
the per user settings unless you run spamd with -x
I'm not quite sure how that would affect my strategy. But it might (or
might not) make autolearn useful.
More important, you may need to reconsider is if per user Bayes will
give you the level of quality you're aiming for, and from experience I
can tell you: it won't.
Site wide bayes works VERY well even under such ugly conditions as
traffic with multiple languages, for ham as well as spam.
