On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 01:10 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-05-24 at 01:12 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > > > The yum upgrade replaced three Perl libraries:
> >
> > Is that everything that was upgraded, or just the Perl bits?
>
> Just the Perl bits.
Figured as much. That rather rhetorical question was meant as a gentle
hint for you to dive down other upgrades, possibly listing them here.
Something changed, something broke. Coincidence? ;)
> > Martin, is spamd running and responding? Try pinging it:
> >
> > spamc -K
>
> Yes, when I started it. 'spamc -K' said SPAMD/1.5 0
By "started it", do you mean starting the daemon simply for that test,
or did you ping spamd after launching your dev test rig?
Clean room vs. production conditions...
> As you may have seen, my SA rules development test rig, which is what is
> doing this odd stuff, starts spamd, runs one or more spams through
> spamc/spamd and stops spamd. I haven't touched that script for a year or
> three, i.e. not since Fedora's daemon management service switched from
> Sys V init to systemd.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
