On 5/23/2014 3:47 PM, Kai Meyer wrote:
So it seems that when I find a problem where command-line is scoring it higher, it's always because of the addition of the URIBL_DB_SPAM score. This seems like a "normal" issue then, and I can deal with that.
That is fairly normal. You should double-check that you have not disabled the network tests in spamd. That is another thing that can cause the URIDBL tests to be missing.
However, I'm getting email that is definitely spam, but they are getting negative scores. Should I seek out further configuration help from this list? Or should I enable site-wise bayesian learning? It seems like I've received 10-20 spam messages (about 40% of my usual volume that isn't filtered out of my inbox) in the last 12 hours. Is that considered "reasonable" and I just need to deal with it, or what?
I would consider 10-20 spam mails/day in my inbox to be very high. 5 spams in my inbox would be a bad day for me.
I'm happy to provide details, but I'm certain that copy-pasting an example spam email to this mailing list wouldn't produce desirable results. I'm perhaps I'm looking for a little hand holding, if anybody has the time. I'd be happy to take this off line, provide http urls to spam emails, ect.
Giving us a sample spam or two would be very useful. It would allow us to see exactly what the spam looks like and how SA is scoring it on your system. This will let us see if there are any obvious problems in your setup.
Don't post the spam here. Put in in pastebin and give us the link. -- Bowie
