that’s nice, but useless unless you also take into account the size of the 
registrar, IOW the number of domains they registered in the same period.


Neil Schwartzman
Executive Director
Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email
http://cauce.org
Tel : (303) 800-6345
Twitter : @cauce




On May 23, 2014, at 12:22 PM, James B. Byrne <byrn...@harte-lyne.ca> wrote:

> While the number of messages getting through has dropped off to near zero this
> morning I nonetheless took the time to look into registrars with respect to
> SPAM and found this interesting web site:  http://rss.uribl.com/nic/
> 
> As of this morning the top domain registrars with respect to spam origin are
> these:
> 
> Top 100 Registrars with Blacklisted Domains for last 5 days
> 
> Rank  Registrar               Listed  Active  Percent
> 1     ENOM, INC.              3335    7403    45.05%
> 
> 2     GO DADDY SOFTWARE, INC. 1326    12718   10.43%
> 
> 3     GMO INTERNET, INC. D/B/A ONAMAE.COM AND DISCOUNT-DOMAIN.COM
>                               1080    1692    63.83%
> 
> 4     REGRU-REG-RIPN          592     1515    39.08%
> 
> 5     PDR LTD. D/B/A PUBLICDOMAINREGISTRY.COM
>                               456     1660    27.47%
> 
> 6     OVH                     321     1710    18.77%
> 
> 7     MONIKER ONLINE SERVICES, INC.
>                               233     488     47.75%
> . . .
> 
> If I read this correctly then one out of every two recently active Enom
> registered domains is engaged in SPAM activities.  What I cannot tell is
> whether the total number of active domains refers to recent registrations (<5
> days old) or number of domains registered with Enom that have evidenced some
> Internet activity as measured by some indeterminate means.
> 
> I also note that the 'Privacy' service for the spam site owner contact
> registered at Enom is Moniker. Who also has a one out of two ratio of spam
> domains to total active domains.
> 
> If this information is accurate then it seems to me on the basis of the
> evidence that it is entirely reasonable to block email from domains registered
> with either Enom or Moniker; and GMO Internet looks like a good candidate as
> well.
> 
> Comments?
> 
> -- 
> ***          E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel          ***
> James B. Byrne                mailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
> Harte & Lyne Limited          http://www.harte-lyne.ca
> 9 Brockley Drive              vox: +1 905 561 1241
> Hamilton, Ontario             fax: +1 905 561 0757
> Canada  L8E 3C3
> 

Reply via email to