I think you need to set some of these options in your local.cf

BASIC MESSAGE TAGGING OPTIONS

remove_header { spam | ham | all } header_name
Headers can be removed from the specified type of messages (spam, ham,
or ``all'' to remove from either). All headers begin with X-Spam- (so
header_name will be appended to X-Spam-).

See also clear_headers for removing all the headers at once.

Note that X-Spam-Checker-Version is not removable because the version
information is needed by mail administrators and developers to debug
problems. Without at least one header, it might not even be possible
to determine that SpamAssassin is running.

On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Re@lබණ්ඩා™ <realba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is there a way to disable spam results from been published to the mail
> header?
> And I could see two sections of spam results in the mail header as follows.
> What could be the reason for that?
>
> From: xxx
> To: xxx
> Thread-Topic: xxxx
> Thread-Index: Ac8/0magIx/1eKsLQWmx3TflU2Na0Q==
> Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:25:53 +0000
> Message-ID: <xxxx>
> Accept-Language: en-US
> Content-Language: en-US
> X-MS-Has-Attach:
> X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
> x-originating-ip: [x.x.x.x]
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-Spam_score: -1.9
> X-Spam_score_int: -18
> X-Spam_bar: -
> X-Spam_report: Spam detection software,
>     running on the system "xxxxxx.com", has
>     identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
>     has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or
>     label similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
>     @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
>     Content preview: xxxxxxxxxx [...]
>     Content analysis details:   (-1.9 points, 4.8 required)
>     pts rule name              description
>     ---- ----------------------
>     --------------------------------------------------
>     -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
>     [score: 0.0000]
>     0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
> Subject: xxxxx
> X-BeenThere: xxxx
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
> Precedence: list
> List-Id: <xxxx>
> List-Unsubscribe: <xxxxxxx>
> List-Archive: <xxxxxxx>
> List-Post: <mailto:xxxxx>
> List-Help: <mailto:xxxxxxxxxx>,
>     <mailto:xxxxx>
> Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
> boundary="===============1539826444465457238=="
> Sender: xxxxxxxx
> Errors-To: xxxxxxxx
> X-Spam_score: 1.6
> X-Spam_score_int: 16
> X-Spam_bar: +
> X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "xxxxxx.com",
> has
>  identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
>  has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
>  similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
>  @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
>
>  Content preview:  xxxxxxxx [...]
>
>  Content analysis details:   (1.6 points, 4.8 required)
>
>   pts rule name              description
>  ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
>  -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
>   0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
>   0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
>                              [score: 0.4901]
>   0.8 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no
> rDNS
> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: x.x.x.x
> X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: xxxxxxx
> X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on xxxxxxxx); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
> --
> Re@lBanda

Reply via email to