Hi all,
Following some off-list discussions with Kevin, John, et al., I had a
question that was suggested I bring up on-list, so here it is:
For whatever reason, many of the FNs I've been getting lately are
passing because they hit BAYES_00, even though they are matching
AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS. I need to enable bayes tokens in the headers so I can
see why these are considered so hammy when I know for sure they're not...
But, I would love if there were a way to ignore the bayes score if
AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS matches. I know this is rather silly -- the whole point
of Bayes is to help determine if an email is spam or ham regardless of the
other rules -- but I'm just flummoxed by having these obviously-spammy emails
being treated as ham.
Should I create a rule that adds extra points if AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS
hits AND a low Bayes score is found? Or should I just make
AC_SPAMMY_URI_PATTERNS a poison pill, since I've never gotten an FP out of it?
Not sure what else to do about these Bayes-killing spams (besides wiping my
entire Bayes DB and starting over).
Thoughts?
Thanks.
--- Amir
