On 2/18/2014 5:54 PM, Dave Pooser wrote:
I use several meta rules that include BAYES_99 and now I'm having to
go rewrite those rules to include (BAYES_99 || BAYES_999).
Which raises the question-- is there a performance hit for making meta
rules include other meta rules? That is:
is
meta _DP_BAYES_VBAD (BAYES_99 || BAYES_999)
meta DP_FRM_INFO_BAYES_VBD DP_FRM_INFO && _DP_BAYES_VBAD
any worse from a performance standpoint than
meta DP_FRM_INFO_BAYES_VBD DP_FRM_INFO && (BAYES_99 || BAYES_999)
under normal conditions?
I'd have to do a Timing run to prove it but I would guess this is
infintessimal.
