2014-02-18 02:34, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:21:47 -0500
"Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com> wrote:
Kevin> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7013 is
Kevin> open on the issue. Should be a very small patch if you want to
Kevin> update your installation.
So, this means that the BAYES_999 mixup is not just a temporary problem
that will be fixed with next data update; those of us who use a
distribution's packaged version are screwed until the distribution
merges the patch. :-(
Why not make the BAYES_999 rule hit *in addition* to BAYES_99
and just assign it an additional score (difference from BAYES_99).
This way the BAYES_99 rule could stay as it is.
Mark
