On 02/17/2014 04:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 2/17/2014 9:36 AM, Axb wrote:
could we agree to set the ceilings on lower safer scores?
Yes, I set the BAYES_999 to the existing score for BAYES_99 +0.2 as a
minor increase.
If possible use different rulenames so as not to tamper with the
existing BAYES_99 stuff which could cause issues on production boxes.
In the end, all we are doing is adding a gradient for 99.9 to 100%. I
will change this in the base rules for better clarity instead because we
already have evidence it's a good move.
and not force publish till we have performance data
I did not force publish. The tflags publish is required for perceptron
to promote the rule according to the information here:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateBackend
Beyond that, the entire point of the ruleqa is to get automatic
performance data to promote rules. ;-)
ya.. I know that and am ok with it for rules but with Bayes stufff I'd
be more than conservative.
imo, changing Bayes scores via auto promotion/sa-update is not
something I'd consider trivial.
Making test on the changes and will commit shortly.
Thx
Axb
