On Friday, November 08 2013, John Hardin wrote: > Not directly addressing your other questions but: running spamassassin > directly is only really suitable for *very* low-traffic environments, > as that will parse and compile all of the rules and other config *per > message*, which is a lot of overhead. spamc+spamd is strongly > recommended for production use.
Thanks a lot for the input, John. I guess I will end up using spamd and spamc, after all. I'll just wait for the answer to my question, and then I'll set everything up here. Regards, -- Sergio
