On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:44:19 -0400
David F. Skoll wrote:
On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:06:35 -0500
Adam Moffett <adamli...@plexicomm.net> wrote:
> I'm reasonably sure that user@ip makes a valid address, but even if
> it is I don't think I've ever observed it anywhere.
My reading of RFC5321 seems to indicate that "user@1.2.3.4" is NOT a
valid address. It should instead be written as "user@[1.2.3.4]"
On 30.10.13 17:53, RW wrote:
If you are referring to 4.1.3. I would say it's defining a routing
mechanism rather than limiting what a valid address is.
4.1.2 defines it as part of mail address:
address-literal = "[" ( IPv4-address-literal /
IPv6-address-literal /
General-address-literal ) "]"
Mailbox = Local-part "@" ( Domain / address-literal )
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod
