On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Jonas Akrouh Larsen wrote:
Mmm well I'd like to use it, but it's also the manual learning.
We use a web frontend which lists quarantined messages and both users
and myself do manual training from there (it just calls sa-learn)
Manual learning is easy to target on the master database. It's the
distributed autolearn that's problematic.
-----Original Message-----
From: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Sent: 22. oktober 2013 16:50
To: SpamAssassin Users List
Subject: RE: Shared bayes SQL between machines
On Tue, 22 Oct 2013, Jonas Akrouh Larsen wrote:
Use standard master-slave replication. Learn and expire only the
master database.
I *think* we support separate credentials for learning to a different
database than you scan from, but I don't follow the Bayes SQL
interface too closely so I'm not sure.
If that was supported it would solve my problem, but the only thing
I've seen was somebody who wrote his own postgresql based module for
splitting it up.
Do you *have* to use autolearn?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maxim V: Close air support and friendly fire should be easier to
tell apart.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
509 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
