On Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:31:41 +0100 Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote:
> My suggestion was meant for the OP rather than generally was made on > the assumption that cvent was not going to listen to any criticism or > police its subscribers. Surely a mailing list provider that does not "police its subscribers" absolutely deserves to be blocked? > A low-cost solution would be for their outgoing MTA to add a header to > tag outgoing messages with identify of the subscriber. Mailing list providers have no incentive to do this unless/until they start getting blocked. It's simple economics. Regards, David.
