Alex, > I realize fuzzyOCR is very limited and resource-intensive, so will > probably just continue to use body and header rules to catch them > until they become more of a problem, unless someone has other > ideas....
>From past experience, there were very few spam where fuzzyOCR would have made a difference, header rules used to catch 99% of the image only spam. > btw, gmail thinks your domain is spam.... What was the error message from gmail? Recently I see a lot of ham being miss-classified by gmail, all mailing lists that I have been reading regularly. Bests, Olivier
