On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Marcio Humpris wrote:
Someone please?
I thought I'd replied to this...
There's really no easy way to do this because the Subject: header is
included in the text the body rules scan, so any rule looking for the
absence of word breaks would be defeated by a multiple-work subject.
This would probably require a plugin. I'm not sure if any of the existing
plugins could be leveraged for this; I doubt it.
There are, however, rules for empty and one-line bodies that may be close
enough.
2013/8/23 Marcio Humpris <marciohump...@gmail.com>
please, i know its been talked about before, but isnt there a rule to deal
with 1 word spams?
spams that just have text "Hi!" and thats it.
If not, if someone can pls advise on a regex to catch this.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...much of our country's counterterrorism security spending is not
designed to protect us from the terrorists, but instead to protect
our public officials from criticism when another attack occurs.
-- Bruce Schneier
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Exercise Your Rights day
