At 3:39 PM -0600 07/31/2013, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
At 3:23 AM +0200 07/25/2013, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
  header LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT    eval:check_for_to_in_subject('user')

And all of them do hit that rule. A super-set of the ADDRESS variant,
using the local part instead of the complete address. Still in stock
rules.

Hmmmmm. One of my users has received at least two spams in recent days with his email address in the Subject line. No LOCALPART or ADDRESS rule hit on either email. sa-update is running nightly and rules are being updated... any idea why this check may not have been run, and/or may not have hit?

I can provide a pastebin if it would be helpful.

A number of my users have been receiving spams with their email addresses in the subject. As Ian noted in an earlier email, LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT doesn't seem to hit for email addresses, and ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT appears to have been removed, so these spams aren't getting tagged for this obviously-spammy behavior.

Could ADDRESS_IN_SUBJECT be restored, and/or could LOCALPART_IN_SUBJECT be expanded to hit when the whole email address is embedded?

Unfortunately these spams aren't getting high spam scores, which is why I'm noticing them. Many get caught by Bayes, but not all.

Thanks.

                                                --- Amir

Reply via email to